Screener
CGUS vs TMFC
Capital Group Core Equity ETF vs Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
Key differences
- CGUS costs 0.17% less per year.
- CGUS is significantly larger than TMFC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGUS follows a active selection strategy; TMFC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, TMFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGUS | TMFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.3B | $2.0B |
| Since | 2022 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 0.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.8% | +28.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.0% | +28.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.27 | 1.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.50% | 13.72% |
| Max drawdown | -22.15% | -33.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGUS and TMFC
Explore further