Screener
CGVV vs VFVA
Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF vs Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF Shares
Key differences
- VFVA costs 0.20% less per year.
- VFVA is significantly larger than CGVV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGVV follows a index tracking strategy; VFVA uses active selection.
- VFVA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGVV | VFVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | 0.13% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $128M | $815M |
| Since | 2025 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +32.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.51% |
| Max drawdown | -10.11% | -48.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGVV and VFVA
Explore further