Screener
CGW vs EQWL
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF
Key differences
- EQWL costs 0.33% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, EQWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGW | EQWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $2.5B |
| Since | 2007 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 1.60% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +24.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.0% | +20.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +12.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 10.50% |
| Max drawdown | -35.72% | -34.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGW and EQWL
Explore further