Screener
CHAT vs FFTY
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF vs CapForce IBD 50 ETF
Key differences
- CHAT costs 0.05% less per year.
- CHAT is significantly larger than FFTY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CHAT follows a active selection strategy; FFTY uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CHAT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FFTY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CHAT | FFTY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $88M |
| Since | 2023 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.17% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +132.5% | +39.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +55.4% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.51 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 30.53% | 34.09% |
| Max drawdown | -31.34% | -59.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CHAT and FFTY
Explore further