Screener
CHAT vs METV
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF vs Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF
Key differences
- METV costs 0.16% less per year.
- CHAT is significantly larger than METV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CHAT follows a active selection strategy; METV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CHAT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CHAT | METV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $232M |
| Since | 2023 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.17% | 0.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +132.5% | +24.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +55.4% | +26.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.51 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 30.53% | 23.94% |
| Max drawdown | -31.34% | -59.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CHAT and METV
Explore further