Screener
CHAT vs RGLO
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF vs Russell Investments Global Equity ETF
Key differences
- RGLO costs 0.26% less per year.
- CHAT is significantly larger than RGLO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CHAT follows a active selection strategy; RGLO uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| CHAT | RGLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $309M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.17% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +132.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +55.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.51 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 30.53% | — |
| Max drawdown | -31.34% | -9.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CHAT and RGLO
Explore further