Screener
CHAU vs SPDN
Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2X Shares vs Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1X Shares
Key differences
- SPDN costs 0.71% less per year.
- CHAU covers emerging markets markets; SPDN covers north america.
- CHAU follows a leveraged strategy; SPDN uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, CHAU has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CHAU | SPDN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $104M | $219M |
| Since | 2015 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.82% | 3.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +73.1% | -18.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.1% | -13.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.6% | -9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.37 | -1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 33.23% | 12.30% |
| Max drawdown | -78.58% | -75.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CHAU and SPDN
Explore further