Screener
CHAU vs YANG
Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2X Shares vs Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X Shares
Key differences
- YANG costs 0.16% less per year.
- CHAU follows a leveraged strategy; YANG uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, CHAU has delivered higher annualized returns.
- YANG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CHAU | YANG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 1.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $104M | $110M |
| Since | 2015 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.82% | 3.76% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +73.1% | -9.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.1% | -46.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.6% | -35.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.37 | -0.34 |
| Volatility 1Y | 33.23% | 58.29% |
| Max drawdown | -78.58% | -99.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CHAU and YANG
Explore further