Screener
CHPX vs PAVE
Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF vs Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF
Key differences
- PAVE is significantly larger than CHPX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PAVE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CHPX | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $40M | $13.4B |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +39.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +17.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 18.91% |
| Max drawdown | -15.15% | -44.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CHPX and PAVE
Explore further