Screener
CHPX vs SNSR
Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF vs Global X Internet of Things ETF
Key differences
- CHPX costs 0.18% less per year.
- SNSR is significantly larger than CHPX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SNSR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CHPX | SNSR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $40M | $218M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.45% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +48.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 23.56% |
| Max drawdown | -15.15% | -38.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CHPX and SNSR
Explore further