Screener
CLOB vs PFXF
Vaneck Aa-bb Clo Etf vs VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF
Key differences
- PFXF is significantly larger than CLOB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CLOB follows a active selection strategy; PFXF uses index tracking.
- PFXF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CLOB | PFXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $167M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2024 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 6.55% | 6.31% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.5% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.03% | 8.86% |
| Max drawdown | -5.54% | -35.49% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CLOB and PFXF
Explore further