Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

CLOI vs BINC

VanEck CLO ETF vs iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

CLOI

VanEck CLO ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.36%

Fund size

$1.3B

BINC

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$16.9B

Key differences

  • BINC is significantly larger than CLOI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

CLOIBINC
Annual cost (TER)0.36%0.40%
Fund size (AUM)$1.3B$16.9B
Since20222023
Dividend yield5.44%5.60%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+5.7%+6.5%
CAGR 3Y+7.2%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.32N/A
Volatility 1Y1.21%2.29%
Max drawdown-3.36%-2.69%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to CLOI and BINC