Screener
CLOI vs CGMU
VanEck CLO ETF vs Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- CGMU costs 0.09% less per year.
- CGMU is significantly larger than CLOI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CLOI follows a active selection strategy; CGMU uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CLOI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CLOI | CGMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $5.8B |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 5.44% | 3.35% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | +4.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.32 | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.21% | 2.31% |
| Max drawdown | -3.36% | -4.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CLOI and CGMU
Explore further