Screener
CLOI vs IMTB
VanEck CLO ETF vs iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
Key differences
- IMTB costs 0.30% less per year.
- CLOI is significantly larger than IMTB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CLOI follows a active selection strategy; IMTB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CLOI has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IMTB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CLOI | IMTB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $280M |
| Since | 2022 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 5.44% | 4.46% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +6.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.32 | 0.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.21% | 4.07% |
| Max drawdown | -3.36% | -18.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CLOI and IMTB
Explore further