Screener
CLOI vs MANI
VanEck CLO ETF vs Man Active Income ETF
Key differences
- CLOI is classified as fixed income, while MANI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- CLOI follows a active selection strategy; MANI uses long short.
Side-by-side comparison
| CLOI | MANI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | — |
| Since | 2022 | — |
| Dividend yield | 5.44% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.32 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.21% | — |
| Max drawdown | -3.36% | -0.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CLOI and MANI
Explore further