Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

CLOI vs SHYM

VanEck CLO ETF vs BlackRock ETF Trust II - iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF

CLOI

VanEck CLO ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.36%

Fund size

$1.3B

SHYM

BlackRock ETF Trust II - iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF

Annual cost

Fund size

Key differences

  • CLOI follows a active selection strategy; SHYM uses index tracking.
  • Over the last 3 years, CLOI has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

CLOISHYM
Annual cost (TER)0.36%
Fund size (AUM)$1.3B
Since2022
Dividend yield5.44%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+5.7%+4.4%
CAGR 3Y+7.2%+5.7%
CAGR 5YN/A+1.2%
Sharpe 3Y1.320.34
Volatility 1Y1.21%3.14%
Max drawdown-3.36%-22.55%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to CLOI and SHYM