Screener
CLOU vs PAVE
Global X Cloud Computing ETF vs Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF
Key differences
- PAVE costs 0.21% less per year.
- PAVE is significantly larger than CLOU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PAVE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CLOU | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $220M | $13.4B |
| Since | 2019 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.3% | +39.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.2% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.1% | +17.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.30 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 27.12% | 18.91% |
| Max drawdown | -53.74% | -44.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CLOU and PAVE
Explore further