Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

CMBS vs MBB

iShares CMBS ETF vs iShares MBS ETF

CMBS

iShares CMBS ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.25%

Fund size

$481M

MBB

iShares MBS ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.04%

Fund size

$38.3B

Key differences

  • MBB costs 0.21% less per year.
  • MBB is significantly larger than CMBS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • MBB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

CMBSMBB
Annual cost (TER)0.25%0.04%
Fund size (AUM)$481M$38.3B
Since20122007
Dividend yield3.52%4.23%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+4.7%+7.4%
CAGR 3Y+4.9%+4.1%
CAGR 5Y+0.9%+0.3%
Sharpe 3Y0.300.11
Volatility 1Y3.64%4.54%
Max drawdown-15.87%-17.65%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to CMBS and MBB