Screener
CMF vs CALI
iShares California Muni Bond ETF vs iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF
Key differences
- CMF costs 0.12% less per year.
- CMF is significantly larger than CALI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CMF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CMF | CALI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.3B | $295M |
| Since | 2007 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.96% | 2.55% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.8% | +3.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.17 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.81% | 0.76% |
| Max drawdown | -14.57% | -0.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CMF and CALI
Explore further