Screener
CNQQ vs IBUY
Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF vs Amplify Online Retail ETF
Key differences
Both CNQQ and IBUY are equity ETFs. CNQQ charges 0.75% a year and IBUY 0.65%. The main difference: CNQQ covers the Asia-Pacific region; IBUY covers global markets.
- CNQQ covers the Asia-Pacific region; IBUY covers global markets.
- IBUY costs 0.10% less per year.
- IBUY is much larger than CNQQ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- IBUY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CNQQ | IBUY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $118M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -11.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 21.60% |
| Max drawdown | -17.82% | -73.00% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.