Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

CNQQ vs IVES

Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF vs Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF

CNQQ

Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF

Annual cost

0.75%

Fund size

$26M

IVES

Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF

Annual cost

0.75%

Fund size

$1.2B

Key differences

Both CNQQ and IVES are equity ETFs. CNQQ charges 0.75% a year and IVES 0.75%. The main difference: CNQQ covers the Asia-Pacific region; IVES covers North America.

  • CNQQ covers the Asia-Pacific region; IVES covers North America.
  • IVES is much larger than CNQQ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

CNQQIVES
Annual cost (TER)0.75%0.75%
Fund size (AUM)$26M$1.2B
Since20252025
Dividend yield
Asset classequityequity
Regionasia pacificnorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1YN/A+47.9%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y26.47%
Max drawdown-17.82%-22.64%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to CNQQ and IVES