Screener
CNRG vs ICLN
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- ICLN costs 0.06% less per year.
- ICLN is significantly larger than CNRG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CNRG is classified as alternative, while ICLN is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- CNRG covers north america markets; ICLN covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, CNRG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ICLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CNRG | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $222M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2018 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.20% | 1.30% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +121.2% | +87.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.4% | +9.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.0% | +2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.51 | 0.34 |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.17% | 25.93% |
| Max drawdown | -68.49% | -66.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CNRG and ICLN
Explore further