Screener
CONI vs CONL
GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF vs GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF
Key differences
- CONL costs 0.11% less per year.
- CONL is significantly larger than CONI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CONI is classified as alternative, while CONL is cryptocurrency — different risk/return profiles.
- CONI follows a structured outcome strategy; CONL uses leveraged.
Side-by-side comparison
| CONI | CONL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.15% | 1.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17M | $582M |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | cryptocurrency |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | structured outcome | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -59.2% | -73.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | 139.54% | 138.51% |
| Max drawdown | -94.53% | -93.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CONI and CONL
Explore further