Screener
CONL vs CONI
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF vs GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF
Key differences
- CONL costs 0.11% less per year.
- CONL is significantly larger than CONI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CONL is classified as cryptocurrency, while CONI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- CONL follows a leveraged strategy; CONI uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| CONL | CONI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.04% | 1.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $582M | $17M |
| Since | 2022 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | -73.5% | -59.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | -4.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.66 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 138.51% | 139.54% |
| Max drawdown | -93.95% | -94.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CONL and CONI
Explore further