Screener
CONL vs TSLR
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF vs Graniteshares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF
Key differences
- TSLR costs 0.09% less per year.
- CONL is significantly larger than TSLR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CONL is classified as cryptocurrency, while TSLR is equity — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| CONL | TSLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.04% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $582M | $123M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -73.5% | +16.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | -4.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.66 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 138.51% | 93.46% |
| Max drawdown | -93.95% | -82.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CONL and TSLR
Explore further