Screener
COPA vs GDX
Themes Copper Miners ETF vs VanEck Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- COPA costs 0.16% less per year.
- GDX is significantly larger than COPA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GDX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| COPA | GDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.51% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $27.3B |
| Since | 2024 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 3.93% | 0.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +116.4% | +70.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +40.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +18.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 38.64% | 45.53% |
| Max drawdown | -34.72% | -49.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to COPA and GDX
Explore further