Screener
COPX vs RSSL
Global X Copper Miners ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- RSSL costs 0.57% less per year.
- COPX is significantly larger than RSSL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- COPX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| COPX | RSSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.4B | $1.4B |
| Since | 2010 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.43% | 1.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +114.0% | +45.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +35.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 41.00% | 19.27% |
| Max drawdown | -65.41% | -27.79% |
Similar to COPX and RSSL
Explore further