Screener
CORB vs BFIX
AB Core Bond ETF vs Build Bond Innovation ETF
Key differences
- CORB costs 0.17% less per year.
- CORB is significantly larger than BFIX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CORB is classified as fixed income, while BFIX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- CORB follows a active selection strategy; BFIX uses option income.
- CORB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CORB | BFIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $999M | $13M |
| Since | 2002 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 4.06% | 3.60% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 2.91% |
| Max drawdown | -3.08% | -8.03% |
Similar to CORB and BFIX
Explore further