Screener
COWS vs SMAP
Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF vs Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- COWS costs 0.41% less per year.
- COWS is significantly larger than SMAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- COWS is classified as alternative, while SMAP is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- COWS follows a option income strategy; SMAP uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| COWS | SMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $33M | $1M |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.66% | 0.42% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.5% | +12.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.24% | 15.82% |
| Max drawdown | -24.75% | -24.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to COWS and SMAP
Explore further