Screener
CPLS vs BFIX
AB Core Plus Bond ETF vs Build Bond Innovation ETF
Key differences
- CPLS costs 0.15% less per year.
- CPLS is significantly larger than BFIX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CPLS is classified as fixed income, while BFIX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- CPLS covers global markets; BFIX covers north america.
- CPLS follows a active selection strategy; BFIX uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| CPLS | BFIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $216M | $13M |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 4.65% | 3.60% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.8% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.91% | 2.91% |
| Max drawdown | -4.44% | -8.03% |
Similar to CPLS and BFIX
Explore further