Screener
CQQQ vs BCTK
Invesco China Technology ETF vs Baron Technology ETF
Key differences
- CQQQ costs 0.10% less per year.
- CQQQ is significantly larger than BCTK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CQQQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CQQQ | BCTK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.7B | $165M |
| Since | 2009 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.22% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.76% | — |
| Max drawdown | -73.99% | -13.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CQQQ and BCTK
Explore further