Screener
CRBN vs PABD
iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF vs iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI World ex USA ETF
Key differences
- PABD costs 0.08% less per year.
- CRBN is significantly larger than PABD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CRBN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CRBN | PABD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $323M |
| Since | 2014 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.08% | 2.62% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.9% | +20.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.09% | 15.60% |
| Max drawdown | -33.13% | -13.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CRBN and PABD
Explore further