Screener
CRDT vs GKAT
Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF vs Scharf Global Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- GKAT costs 0.40% less per year.
- GKAT is significantly larger than CRDT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CRDT is classified as fixed income, while GKAT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- GKAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CRDT | GKAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $38M | $158M |
| Since | 2023 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 6.51% | 0.46% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.48% | — |
| Max drawdown | -9.80% | -10.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CRDT and GKAT
Explore further