Screener
CRDT vs MTBA
Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF vs Simplify MBS ETF
Key differences
- MTBA costs 0.84% less per year.
- MTBA is significantly larger than CRDT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CRDT is classified as fixed income, while MTBA is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- CRDT follows a active selection strategy; MTBA uses multi strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| CRDT | MTBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $38M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 6.51% | 5.53% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.0% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.48% | 3.11% |
| Max drawdown | -9.80% | -3.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CRDT and MTBA
Explore further