Screener
CRUX vs NJNK
Columbia Core Bond ETF vs Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF
Key differences
- CRUX costs 0.14% less per year.
- CRUX is significantly larger than NJNK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CRUX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CRUX | NJNK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.46% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $47M |
| Since | 2009 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.00% | 6.30% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 4.03% |
| Max drawdown | -1.86% | -4.47% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CRUX and NJNK
Explore further