Screener
CRUX vs SBND
Columbia Core Bond ETF vs Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF
Key differences
- SBND costs 0.07% less per year.
- CRUX is significantly larger than SBND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CRUX follows a active selection strategy; SBND uses index tracking.
- CRUX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CRUX | SBND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $202M |
| Since | 2009 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 4.00% | 4.54% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 2.50% |
| Max drawdown | -1.86% | -10.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CRUX and SBND
Explore further