Screener
CSD vs RFG
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RFG costs 0.30% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, CSD has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CSD | RFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $145M | $329M |
| Since | 2006 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 0.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +75.4% | +34.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +36.3% | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.2% | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.98% | 18.65% |
| Max drawdown | -57.55% | -42.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CSD and RFG
Explore further