Screener
CSM vs OEF
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus vs iShares S&P 100 ETF
Key differences
- OEF costs 0.25% less per year.
- OEF is significantly larger than CSM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CSM is classified as alternative, while OEF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- CSM follows a long short strategy; OEF uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, OEF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- OEF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CSM | OEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $499M | $19.6B |
| Since | 2009 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.05% | 0.88% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.2% | +31.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | +25.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.4% | +15.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | 1.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 12.88% |
| Max drawdown | -36.11% | -31.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CSM and OEF
Explore further