Screener
CSMD vs DUSG
Congress SMID Growth ETF vs U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio: ETF Class Shares
Key differences
- DUSG costs 0.36% less per year.
- DUSG is significantly larger than CSMD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CSMD follows a active selection strategy; DUSG uses index tracking.
- DUSG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CSMD | DUSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $433M | $1.9B |
| Since | 2023 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.93% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.54% | -4.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CSMD and DUSG
Explore further