Screener
CSMD vs FSGS
Congress SMID Growth ETF vs First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF
Key differences
- FSGS costs 0.07% less per year.
- CSMD is significantly larger than FSGS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CSMD follows a active selection strategy; FSGS uses index tracking.
- FSGS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CSMD | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $433M | $29M |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.9% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.93% | 15.30% |
| Max drawdown | -22.54% | -43.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CSMD and FSGS
Explore further