Screener
CTA vs RSIT
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF vs Return Stacked International Stocks & Managed Futures ETF
Key differences
- CTA costs 0.23% less per year.
- CTA follows a systematic alpha strategy; RSIT uses multi strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| CTA | RSIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | — |
| Since | 2022 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 4.03% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.66 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.72% | — |
| Max drawdown | -18.07% | -2.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CTA and RSIT
Explore further