Screener
CTEC vs URA
Global X ClimateTech ETF vs Global X Uranium ETF
Key differences
- CTEC costs 0.19% less per year.
- URA is significantly larger than CTEC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, URA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- URA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CTEC | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30M | $7.8B |
| Since | 2020 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.59% | 3.75% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +131.2% | +65.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.6% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.8% | +23.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.15 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.90% | 49.70% |
| Max drawdown | -81.58% | -61.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CTEC and URA
Explore further