Screener
CVY vs FTOH
Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF vs Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- FTOH costs 0.86% less per year.
- CVY is classified as mixed asset, while FTOH is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- CVY covers global markets; FTOH covers north america.
- CVY follows a active selection strategy; FTOH uses index tracking.
- CVY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CVY | FTOH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.21% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $119M | $69M |
| Since | 2006 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 3.74% | 3.34% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.04% | — |
| Max drawdown | -50.47% | -2.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CVY and FTOH
Explore further