Screener
CWB vs CBXA
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Convertible Securities ETF vs Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Struc
Key differences
CWB is a fixed income ETF, while CBXA is a cryptocurrency ETF. CWB charges 0.40% a year and CBXA 0.69%.
- CWB is a fixed income fund, while CBXA is a cryptocurrency fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- CWB follows a index tracking strategy; CBXA uses active selection.
- CWB costs 0.29% less per year.
- CWB is much larger than CBXA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- CWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CWB | CBXA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.2B | $4M |
| Since | 2009 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.37% | 2.36% |
| Asset class | fixed income | cryptocurrency |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | -23.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.77% | 18.05% |
| Max drawdown | -32.06% | -28.98% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.