Screener
CWI vs CRBN
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF vs iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF
Key differences
- CRBN costs 0.10% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, CRBN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CWI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CWI | CRBN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.7B | $1.1B |
| Since | 2007 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 2.73% | 2.08% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.6% | +27.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | +21.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.1% | +11.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.25% | 13.09% |
| Max drawdown | -34.64% | -33.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CWI and CRBN
Explore further