Screener
CWS vs DCOR
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF vs Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF
Key differences
- DCOR costs 0.51% less per year.
- DCOR is significantly larger than CWS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CWS is classified as equity, while DCOR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- CWS follows a active selection strategy; DCOR uses multi strategy.
- CWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CWS | DCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $155M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2016 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.31% | 0.95% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.0% | +29.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.52 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.34% | 11.99% |
| Max drawdown | -33.82% | -19.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CWS and DCOR
Explore further