Screener
CWS vs FFDI
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Developed
Key differences
- FFDI costs 0.10% less per year.
- CWS is significantly larger than FFDI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CWS follows a active selection strategy; FFDI uses index tracking.
- CWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CWS | FFDI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $155M | $22M |
| Since | 2016 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.31% | 2.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.0% | +12.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.52 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.34% | 16.99% |
| Max drawdown | -33.82% | -14.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CWS and FFDI
Explore further