Screener
CWS vs GFGF
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF vs Guru Favorite Stocks ETF
Key differences
- CWS is significantly larger than GFGF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, GFGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CWS | GFGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $155M | $36M |
| Since | 2016 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.31% | 0.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +1.0% | +13.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.51 | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.35% | 12.50% |
| Max drawdown | -33.82% | -27.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CWS and GFGF
Explore further