Screener
CWS vs GPZ
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF vs VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF
Key differences
Both CWS and GPZ are equity ETFs. CWS charges 0.65% a year and GPZ 0.40%. The main difference: CWS follows a active selection strategy; GPZ uses index tracking.
- CWS follows a active selection strategy; GPZ uses index tracking.
- CWS covers North America; GPZ covers global markets.
- GPZ costs 0.25% less per year.
- CWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CWS | GPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $133M | $245M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.31% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +0.9% | -9.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.54 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 27.83% |
| Max drawdown | -33.82% | -31.72% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.