Screener
CWS vs MANI
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF vs Man Active Income ETF
Key differences
- CWS is classified as equity, while MANI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- CWS covers north america markets; MANI covers emerging markets.
- CWS follows a active selection strategy; MANI uses long short.
Side-by-side comparison
| CWS | MANI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $155M | — |
| Since | 2016 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.31% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.52 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.34% | — |
| Max drawdown | -33.82% | -0.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CWS and MANI
Explore further